Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

API: Move the enableCommonBootImageImport field to spec #3187

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

API: Move the enableCommonBootImageImport field to spec #3187

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator

@nunnatsa nunnatsa commented Dec 3, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it

The enableCommonBootImageImport is not a feature gate. It does not have a life cycle. It's just a regular enabler. Placing this enabler under spec.featureGates is misleading.

This PR deprecates the spec.featureGates.enableCommonBootImageImport field, and add the spec.enableCommonBootImageImport field, instead.

Jira Ticket

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-51991

Release note

Deprecated `spec.featureGates.enableCommonBootImageImport` .

Added the `spec.enableCommonBootImageImport` field, instead.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels Dec 3, 2024
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from nunnatsa. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12141398919

Details

  • 6 of 6 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 71.875%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12107257272: 0.02%
Covered Lines: 6021
Relevant Lines: 8377
💛 - Coveralls

@nunnatsa
Move the enableCommonBootImageImport field
b4f8c3f 
Deprecated the `spec.featureGates.enableCommonBootImageImport`
field. Added the `spec.enableCommonBootImageImport` field instead.

Signed-off-by: Nahshon Unna-Tsameret <[email protected]>
@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nunnatsa commented Dec 3, 2024

/retest

1 similar comment
@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nunnatsa commented Dec 4, 2024

/retest

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Dec 4, 2024

hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp

In response to this:

hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Dec 4, 2024

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Dec 4, 2024

hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-operator-sdk-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hco-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

hco-bot commented Dec 4, 2024

hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure
hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure

In response to this:

hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure
hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded.
/override ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2024

@nunnatsa: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws b4f8c3f link false /test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws
ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure b4f8c3f link true /test hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure b4f8c3f link true /test hco-e2e-operator-sdk-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure b4f8c3f link true /test hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure
ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure b4f8c3f link true /test hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@nunnatsa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nunnatsa commented Dec 5, 2024

/hold

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Dec 5, 2024
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nunnatsa: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.32 b4f8c3f link true /test pull-hyperconverged-cluster-operator-e2e-k8s-1.32

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@avlitman avlitman Awaiting requested review from avlitman

@orenc1 orenc1 Awaiting requested review from orenc1

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@nunnatsa @kubevirt-bot @coveralls @hco-bot